Introduction

The legal profession is held to a high standard of ethics and conduct to ensure justice and fairness in society. Lawyers are entrusted with significant responsibilities, including upholding the rule of law and representing their clients competently and ethically. However, when lawyers fail to meet these standards, the consequences can be severe, potentially leading to disbarment.

Disbarment is the process by which a lawyer is stripped of their license to practice law, effectively ending their legal career[1]. In the United Kingdom, disbarment is a rare but necessary measure when a lawyer’s actions seriously breach professional standards. Understanding the disbarment process is crucial to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the legal profession.

Why is there a need for disbarment?

Disbarment serves several important purposes within the legal profession and the broader society:

1. Maintaining Professional Standards[2]: Disbarment is necessary to uphold the integrity and credibility of the legal profession. Lawyers are entrusted with significant responsibilities, including representing clients competently and ethically, upholding the rule of law, and promoting justice. Disbarment ensures that lawyers who fail to meet these standards are held accountable for their actions, thereby preserving the reputation of the legal profession.

2. Protecting Clients: Disbarment protects clients from incompetent or unethical legal representation. Lawyers have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of their clients and to provide competent and ethical representation. Disbarment removes lawyers who have violated this duty from practising law, safeguarding clients from potential harm or misconduct.

3. Upholding Public Trust: Disbarment helps maintain public trust in the legal system by demonstrating that lawyers are held to account for their actions. Trust in the legal profession is essential for ensuring access to justice and the fair administration of the law. Disbarment of lawyers who engage in misconduct sends a clear message that unethical behaviour will not be tolerated, thereby bolstering public confidence in the legal system.

4. Deterrence: Disbarment serves as a deterrent against unethical behaviour within the legal profession. Knowing that serious misconduct can result in the loss of their license to practice law, lawyers are incentivized to adhere to professional standards and ethics. Disbarment acts as a deterrent not only for the individual lawyer facing disciplinary action but also for other legal professionals who may be tempted to engage in similar misconduct.

5.  Promoting Accountability[3]: Disbarment promotes accountability within the legal profession by ensuring that lawyers are responsible for their actions. Lawyers, like all professionals, are expected to abide by a code of ethics and conduct. Disbarment holds lawyers accountable when they violate these standards, reinforcing the principle that no one is above the law, regardless of their profession.

Law of Disbarment

In the United Kingdom, the process of disbarment for lawyers, also known as “striking off” or “being struck off,” involves the removal of a lawyer’s name from the role of solicitors or barristers. This can occur due to various reasons, including professional misconduct, criminal convictions, or breaches of professional regulations. The exact procedures and regulations governing disbarment vary between solicitors and barristers, as they operate under different regulatory bodies.

For solicitors in England and Wales, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) oversees the regulation and discipline of solicitors. The SRA has the authority to investigate complaints against solicitors and can impose various sanctions, including fines, suspensions, or striking off, depending on the severity of the misconduct.

One example of disbarment in the UK involves the case of Ryan Beckwith[4], a partner at a prominent law firm, who was struck off by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in 2020 for engaging in sexual activity with a junior colleague while she was intoxicated. This case received significant media attention and highlighted the importance of maintaining professional conduct within the legal profession.

For barristers in England and Wales, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) regulates the profession and handles disciplinary matters. Similar to the SRA, the BSB can investigate complaints against barristers and impose sanctions for misconduct, including disbarment.

An example involving disbarment of a barrister includes the case of Constance Briscoe, who was struck off the Bar in 2016 for lying to police during the investigation of former Cabinet Minister Chris Huhne’s speeding points case[5]. Briscoe was found guilty of perverting the course of justice, and her actions were deemed incompatible with the standards expected of a barrister.

The Process of Disbarment[6]:

The process of disbarment in the UK is governed by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) for barristers and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) for solicitors.

1. Complaint and Investigation:

Disbarment proceedings typically begin with a complaint lodged against the lawyer in question. The complaint may come from a variety of sources, including clients, colleagues, or members of the public. Upon receiving a complaint, the relevant regulatory body initiates an investigation to assess its validity.[7]

2. Disciplinary Proceedings:

If the investigation uncovers evidence of misconduct, disciplinary proceedings are initiated. The lawyer facing allegations of misconduct is notified and allowed to respond to the accusations. The disciplinary proceedings may involve hearings, during which evidence is presented and witnesses may be called upon to testify.

3. Decision and Sanctions:

Following the disciplinary proceedings, a decision is made regarding the lawyer’s conduct. If the allegations are proven, the regulatory body has the authority to impose sanctions ranging from fines and reprimands to suspension or disbarment. The severity of the sanction depends on the nature and gravity of the misconduct.

4. Appeals Process:

Lawyers have the right to appeal the decision if they believe it is unjust or disproportionate. The appeals process allows for an independent review of the case by a higher authority, such as an appeals tribunal or court[8]. However, successful appeals are relatively rare, as disciplinary decisions are typically based on thorough investigations and evidence.

5. Publication and Transparency:

In the interest of transparency and maintaining public trust in the legal profession, disciplinary decisions are often made public[9]. This serves to inform the public about the outcome of the proceedings and deter other lawyers from engaging in similar misconduct.

Conclusion:

The process of disbarment in the United Kingdom serves as a cornerstone in upholding the integrity and credibility of the legal profession. By holding lawyers accountable for their actions through a transparent and rigorous disciplinary process, disbarment safeguards the interests of clients, maintains public trust in the legal system, and promotes accountability among legal professionals.

From investigating complaints to conducting disciplinary proceedings and imposing sanctions, regulatory bodies like the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the Bar Standards Board (BSB) play a crucial role in ensuring that lawyers adhere to the highest standards of professional conduct. The recent cases of Ryan Beckwith and Constance Briscoe underscore the seriousness with which instances of misconduct are addressed, regardless of a lawyer’s standing within the profession.

Ultimately, disbarment serves as a deterrent against unethical behaviour, reinforcing the principle that no one is above the law, even within the legal profession. By removing lawyers who fail to meet the ethical and professional standards expected of them, disbarment helps maintain the integrity of the legal profession, ensuring that it continues to serve the interests of justice and the public good.

---

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/disbarment

[2] https://www.lawbiz.com/e-mailed_newsletters/tip-2-7-12.html

[3] https://law.usnews.com/law-firms/advice/articles/what-does-it-take-for-an-attorney-to-be-disbarred

[4] https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Beckwith-v-SRA-judgment.pdf

[5] https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-27244889

[6]https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/about-us/how-we-regulate/the-decisions-we-take/enforcement-decisions/tribunals-and-findings/the-disciplinary-tribunals-process.html

[7] https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1916&context=hlr

[8] https://www.acas.org.uk/disciplinary-and-grievance-procedures

[9] https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/standards-regulations/regulatory-disciplinary-procedure-rules/

---